Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video993 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Strategy results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 536 hits. Analysis detected 3,474 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ā 51% (6,392 of 13,018 topics). This White House Strategy is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
White House Strategy
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Oakland Culture1%
ā 0%Dive Bars1%
ā 51%White House Strategy (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,972
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
White House Strategy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
White House Strategy vs sitewide
White House Strategy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos