Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video335 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Relations results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 1,466 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,005 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,212 of 15,712 topics). This White House Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
White House Relations
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠86%White House Relations (selected)8%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,005
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
White House Relations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
White House Relations vs sitewide
White House Relations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos