Topic summary
12%1 analyzed article/video2,314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Initiatives results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 448 hits. Analysis detected 2,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,942 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (15,516 of 16,562 topics). This White House Initiatives is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
White House Initiatives
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
White House Initiatives attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
White House Initiatives vs sitewide
White House Initiatives attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.