Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Correspondents Dinner Shooting results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 485 hits. Analysis detected 4,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,749 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (9,631 of 13,154 topics). This White House Correspondents Dinner Shooting is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
White House Correspondents Dinner Shooting attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
White House Correspondents Dinner Shooting vs sitewide
White House Correspondents Dinner Shooting attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.