Topic summary
ā 0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Correspondentsā Dinner results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 400 hits. Analysis detected 4,534 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,376 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ā 36% (8,583 of 13,257 topics). This White House Correspondentsā Dinner is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
White House Correspondentsā Dinner
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
White House Correspondentsā Dinner attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
White House Correspondentsā Dinner vs sitewide
White House Correspondentsā Dinner attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.