Topic summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video1,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Weapons Charges results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Representativeness Heuristic, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 753 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (14,769 of 24,545 topics). This Weapons Charges is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Weapons Charges
Topic details
Total words: 3,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos