Topic summary
â 94%1 analyzed article/video611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War Crimes Investigations results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 488 hits. Analysis detected 3,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,833 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of â 84% (2,534 of 15,792 topics). This War Crimes Investigations is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
War Crimes Investigations
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
War Crimes Investigations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
War Crimes Investigations vs sitewide
War Crimes Investigations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.