Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Voting Rights Act Of 1965 results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Status Quo Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 109 faulty-reasoning hits from 352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (2,541 of 11,454 topics). This Voting Rights Act Of 1965 is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.

Voting Rights Act Of 1965

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Survival Stories	1%
⁠0%	Gender Identity	1%
⁠78%	Voting Rights Act Of 1965 (selected)	7%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 352

Article count: 1

Authors

Patrick Marley

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Voting Rights Act Of 1965 attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Voting Rights Act Of 1965 vs All Other Publications

Voting Rights Act Of 1965 attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

South Carolina Republicans block Trump’s effort to gain more House seats⁠^14%

The Washington Post⁠^0%By Patrick Marley⁠^0%5/26/2026, 2:17:50 PM