Topic summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video1,842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Veterans In Law Enforcement results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 1,274 hits. Analysis detected 7,849 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (7,646 of 24,545 topics). This Veterans In Law Enforcement is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Veterans In Law Enforcement
Topic details
Total words: 7,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.3%12.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.5%9.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos