Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These Vermont State Senate Elections results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 404 hits. Analysis detected 3,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 13,034 topics). This Vermont State Senate Elections is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Vermont State Senate Elections

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	Vermont State Senate Elections (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 6,276

Article count: 1

Authors

Theo Wells-Spackman

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Vermont State Senate Elections attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Vermont State Senate Elections vs sitewide

Vermont State Senate Elections attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

What does it cost to break into the Vermont Senate? In Chittenden County, campaign funds reach new heights.⁠^37%

VTDigger⁠^11%By Theo Wells-Spackman⁠^0%7/17/2026, 9:37:18 PM