Topic summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Verdicts results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 1,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (13,404 of 21,483 topics). This Verdicts is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Verdicts
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%4-H Schedule1%
⁠0%4 H Schedule1%
⁠0%Musician Biographies1%
⁠0%Cleveland Politics1%
⁠0%Summer Traditions1%
⁠38%Verdicts (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,024
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Verdicts attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Verdicts vs sitewide
Verdicts attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos