Topic summary

⁠100%1 analyzed article/video193 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Vanderbilt University results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 51.3% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 2,130 faulty-reasoning hits from 579 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (760 of 14,053 topics). This Vanderbilt University is worse (more manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group.

Vanderbilt University

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠95%	Vanderbilt University (selected)	13%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 579

Article count: 1

Authors

Eugene Volokh

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Vanderbilt University attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Vanderbilt University vs sitewide

Vanderbilt University attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

"Academics Spent Years Lending Their Institutional Credibility to Various Political Projects"⁠^97%

Reason.com⁠^39%By Eugene Volokh⁠^6%7/19/2026, 8:42:57 PM