Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Supreme Court results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 313 hits. Analysis detected 2,003 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,717 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (11,470 of 13,257 topics). This Utah Supreme Court is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Utah Supreme Court
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Utah Supreme Court attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Utah Supreme Court vs sitewide
Utah Supreme Court attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.