Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Judiciary results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 489 hits. Analysis detected 4,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,163 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (10,901 of 13,018 topics). This Utah Judiciary is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Utah Judiciary
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Utah Judiciary attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Utah Judiciary vs sitewide
Utah Judiciary attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.