Topic summary
⁠59%2 analyzed articles/videos946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These User Interface Changes results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 2,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,355 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (14,685 of 21,818 topics). This User Interface Changes is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
User Interface Changes
Topic details
Total words: 3,355
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos