Topic summary
26%1 analyzed article/video593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Social Security Administration Data results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 1,339 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,779 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 55% (6,760 of 14,985 topics). This US Social Security Administration Data is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
US Social Security Administration Data
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
US Social Security Administration Data attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
US Social Security Administration Data vs sitewide
US Social Security Administration Data attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.