Topic summary
15%1 analyzed article/video539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Senate Voting results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 839 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (10,759 of 19,178 topics). This US Senate Voting is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
US Senate Voting
Topic details
Total words: 2,156
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
US Senate Voting attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
US Senate Voting vs sitewide
US Senate Voting attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos