Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These US Senate Judiciary Committee results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 223 hits. Analysis detected 944 faulty-reasoning hits from 818 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 17,205 topics). This US Senate Judiciary Committee is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
US Senate Judiciary Committee
Topic details
Total words: 818
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
US Senate Judiciary Committee attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
US Senate Judiciary Committee vs sitewide
US Senate Judiciary Committee attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos