Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These US Senate Hearings results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 778 hits. Analysis detected 2,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,726 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 13,034 topics). This US Senate Hearings is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

US Senate Hearings

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	US Senate Hearings (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 3,726

Article count: 1

Authors

Pien Huang

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

US Senate Hearings attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

US Senate Hearings vs sitewide

US Senate Hearings attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

CDC director nominee Erica Schwartz faced questions in Senate hearing⁠^36%

WFAE 90.7 - Charlotte's NPR News Source⁠^0%By Pien Huang⁠^63%7/15/2026, 9:00:00 AM