Topic summary
63%13 analyzed articles/videos6,806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Senate Elections results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 3,239 hits. Analysis detected 37,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,272 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 10% (10,836 of 12,043 topics). This Us Senate Elections is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group.
Us Senate Elections
Topic details
Total words: 43,272
Article count: 13
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Us Senate Elections attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Us Senate Elections vs sitewide
Us Senate Elections attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.