Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These US Senate Election results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,763 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 14,904 topics). This US Senate Election is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
US Senate Election
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
US Senate Election attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
US Senate Election vs sitewide
US Senate Election attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.