Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Senate Budget Committee results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 298 hits. Analysis detected 1,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (3,616 of 14,248 topics). This US Senate Budget Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
US Senate Budget Committee
Topic details
Total words: 1,176
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
US Senate Budget Committee attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
US Senate Budget Committee vs sitewide
US Senate Budget Committee attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos