Topic summary

⁠97%1 analyzed article/video175 analyzed words

BS Summary: These US Saudi Relations results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Slippery Slope, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 901 faulty-reasoning hits from 525 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,404 of 14,853 topics). This US Saudi Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.

US Saudi Relations

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠0%	Alameda County	1%
⁠0%	Terms Of Use	1%
⁠91%	US Saudi Relations (selected)	10%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 525

Article count: 1

Authors

Matthew Martin

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

US Saudi Relations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

US Saudi Relations vs sitewide

US Saudi Relations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Riyadh wins US nuclear concessions⁠^84%

Semafor⁠^84%By Matthew Martin⁠^92%7/22/2026, 1:03:59 PM