Topic summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video1,736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Military Strategy In Africa results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 1,418 hits. Analysis detected 8,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,944 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (8,754 of 24,545 topics). This US Military Strategy In Africa is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
US Military Strategy In Africa
Topic details
Total words: 6,944
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.4%20.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 12.8%12.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos