Topic summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video1,285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us-Libya Relations results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 525 hits. Analysis detected 3,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (7,884 of 21,877 topics). This Us-Libya Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Us-Libya Relations
Topic details
Total words: 5,140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos