Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Iran Talks results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 1,321 hits. Analysis detected 9,299 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,440 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 44% (7,405 of 13,018 topics). This US Iran Talks is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
US Iran Talks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
US Iran Talks vs sitewide
US Iran Talks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.