Topic summary
ā 56%1 analyzed article/video1,307 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Immigration Courts results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 1,221 hits. Analysis detected 6,111 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,755 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ā 40% (9,532 of 15,899 topics). This US Immigration Courts is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
US Immigration Courts
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 40%US Immigration Courts (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 7,755
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
US Immigration Courts attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
US Immigration Courts vs sitewide
US Immigration Courts attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos