Topic summary
55%2 analyzed articles/videos1,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US House Elections results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 684 hits. Analysis detected 5,326 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,082 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (12,491 of 14,979 topics). This US House Elections is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
US House Elections
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
US House Elections attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
US House Elections vs sitewide
US House Elections attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.