Topic summary
89%26 analyzed articles/videos17,546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US China Relations results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 9,724 hits. Analysis detected 88,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 80,566 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (9,549 of 12,389 topics). This US China Relations is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
US China Relations
Topic details
Total words: 80,566
Article count: 26
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
US China Relations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
US China Relations vs sitewide
US China Relations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.