Topic summary
⁠24%1 analyzed article/video985 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Airpower In The Pacific results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 224 hits. Analysis detected 1,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (16,901 of 23,967 topics). This US Airpower In The Pacific is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
US Airpower In The Pacific
Topic details
Total words: 3,940
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos