Topic summary

⁠93%1 analyzed article/video610 analyzed words

BS Summary: These University Governance results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.7% saturation with 561 hits. Analysis detected 1,930 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,830 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (3,889 of 15,847 topics). This University Governance is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.

University Governance

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠76%	University Governance (selected)	6%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 1,830

Article count: 1

Authors

Anna Miller

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

University Governance attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

University Governance vs sitewide

University Governance attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Rutgers Law podcast puts university oversight of affiliated centers under scrutiny⁠^72%

American Thinker⁠^93%By Anna Miller⁠^94%7/24/2026, 4:00:00 AM