Topic summary
7%1 analyzed article/video1,694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Border Patrol Collaboration results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 2,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (18,352 of 19,087 topics). This University Border Patrol Collaboration is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
University Border Patrol Collaboration
Topic details
Total words: 6,776
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
University Border Patrol Collaboration attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
University Border Patrol Collaboration vs sitewide
University Border Patrol Collaboration attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos