Topic summary
7%1 analyzed article/video1,694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Border Patrol Collaboration results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 2,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (18,352 of 19,087 topics). This University Border Patrol Collaboration is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
University Border Patrol Collaboration
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
University Border Patrol Collaboration attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
University Border Patrol Collaboration vs sitewide
University Border Patrol Collaboration attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.