Topic summary
70%1 analyzed article/video637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States District Court For The Western District Of Pennsylvania results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,911 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 71% (4,810 of 16,562 topics). This United States District Court For The Western District Of Pennsylvania is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
United States District Court For The Western District Of Pennsylvania
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
United States District Court For The Western District Of Pennsylvania attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
United States District Court For The Western District Of Pennsylvania vs sitewide
United States District Court For The Western District Of Pennsylvania attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.