Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ukrainian results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 293 faulty-reasoning hits from 302 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Ukrainian is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ukrainian
Topic details
Total words: 302
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles302 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.5%18.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 8.6%8.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.6%9.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 22.9%22.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Circular Reasoning: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos