Topic summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos4,390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S China Relations results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,815 hits. Analysis detected 17,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,319 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (8,555 of 13,023 topics). This U S China Relations is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
U S China Relations
Topic details
Total words: 15,319
Article count: 8
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
U S China Relations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
U S China Relations vs sitewide
U S China Relations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.