Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,428 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Trust In Science results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 498 hits. Analysis detected 3,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,260 of 16,562 topics). This Trust In Science is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.

Trust In Science

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠20%	Trust In Science (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 5,712

Article count: 1

Authors

Dannell D. Boatman

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Trust In Science attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Trust In Science vs sitewide

Trust In Science attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Ivermectin isn’t a cancer miracle drug, but influencers claim otherwise – here’s how to avoid sprinting past scientific evidence⁠^31%

The Conversation⁠^0%By Dannell D. Boatman⁠^0%7/8/2026, 12:06:26 PM