Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Compensation Fund results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 783 hits. Analysis detected 3,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 45% (7,348 of 13,257 topics). This Trump Compensation Fund is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Trump Compensation Fund
Topic details
Total words: 3,912
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Trump Compensation Fund attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Trump Compensation Fund vs sitewide
Trump Compensation Fund attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos