Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These Tribunales Federales results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Bandwagon, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 198 faulty-reasoning hits from 858 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,877 topics). This Tribunales Federales is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Tribunales Federales

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Wyomings Big Show	1%
⁠0%	Wyoming's Big Show	1%
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	Tribunales Federales (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 858

Article count: 1

Authors

Isabella Aldrete

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Tribunales Federales attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Tribunales Federales vs sitewide

Tribunales Federales attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Tribunal federal de apelaciones que abarca a Nevada rechaza política de Trump de detención obligatoria⁠^8%

The Nevada Independent⁠^33%By Isabella Aldrete⁠^0%7/30/2026, 1:00:19 PM