Topic summary
⁠20%1 analyzed article/video899 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tribal Land Rights results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 1,464 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (18,725 of 23,956 topics). This Tribal Land Rights is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Tribal Land Rights
Topic details
Total words: 3,596
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Middle Ground: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos