Topic summary
13%1 analyzed article/video508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tree Poisoning Investigation results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 524 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (17,658 of 22,900 topics). This Tree Poisoning Investigation is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Tree Poisoning Investigation
Topic details
Total words: 2,032
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos