Topic summary

⁠36%1 analyzed article/video1,022 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Transport For London (tfl) results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anchoring Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 314 hits. Analysis detected 1,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,066 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (9,395 of 13,021 topics). This Transport For London (tfl) is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.

Transport For London (tfl)

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠28%	Transport For London (tfl) (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 3,066

Article count: 1

Authors

Swati Khandelwal

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Transport For London (tfl) attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Transport For London (tfl) vs sitewide

Transport For London (tfl) attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Two Scattered Spider Hackers Get 5.5 Years Each for £29 Million TfL Hack⁠^22%

The Hacker News⁠^22%By Swati Khandelwal⁠^12%7/16/2026, 5:09:00 PM