Topic summary

⁠31%1 analyzed article/video2,123 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Transparency In Higher Education results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 453 hits. Analysis detected 3,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,369 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (15,323 of 16,558 topics). This Transparency In Higher Education is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.

Transparency In Higher Education

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠8%	Transparency In Higher Education (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 6,369

Article count: 1

Authors

Kim Kozlowski

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Transparency In Higher Education attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Transparency In Higher Education vs sitewide

Transparency In Higher Education attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Corporation aims to boost MSU sports revenue. Should it operate in secret?⁠^26%

Bridge Michigan⁠^58%By Kim Kozlowski⁠^35%7/23/2026, 9:16:51 PM