Topic summary
3%1 analyzed article/video197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Toronto Fc results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 86 faulty-reasoning hits from 788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 55% (9,652 of 21,285 topics). This Toronto Fc is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Toronto Fc
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Toronto Fc attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Toronto Fc vs sitewide
Toronto Fc attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.