Topic summary
52%1 analyzed article/video584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Human Life Protection Act results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,670 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,532 of 16,562 topics). This Texas Human Life Protection Act is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Texas Human Life Protection Act
Topic details
Total words: 1,752
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Texas Human Life Protection Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Texas Human Life Protection Act vs sitewide
Texas Human Life Protection Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos