Topic summary
52%1 analyzed article/video584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Human Life Protection Act results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,670 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,532 of 16,562 topics). This Texas Human Life Protection Act is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Texas Human Life Protection Act
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Texas Human Life Protection Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Texas Human Life Protection Act vs sitewide
Texas Human Life Protection Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.