Topic summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video1,249 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technology And Relationships results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Self-Serving Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 405 hits. Analysis detected 2,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (17,461 of 24,545 topics). This Technology And Relationships is better (less manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
Technology And Relationships
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,996
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos