Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tax Abatements results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 1,648 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,245 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,352 topics). This Tax Abatements is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Tax Abatements
Topic details
Total words: 4,245
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos