Topic summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tan Suit Controversy results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hindsight Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 284 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (9,686 of 24,545 topics). This Tan Suit Controversy is worse (more manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Tan Suit Controversy
Topic details
Total words: 1,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510060.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.0%8.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.6%2.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 1.8%1.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos