Topic summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Synagogues results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.2% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 526 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (15,889 of 24,545 topics). This Synagogues is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Synagogues
Topic details
Total words: 2,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos