Topic summary
5%2 analyzed articles/videos4,428 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Security results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 767 hits. Analysis detected 6,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,712 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (12,237 of 12,295 topics). This Supreme Court Security is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Supreme Court Security
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Supreme Court Security attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Supreme Court Security vs sitewide
Supreme Court Security attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.