Topic summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video2,419 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Jurisprudence results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 563 hits. Analysis detected 2,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,257 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (19,507 of 24,545 topics). This Supreme Court Jurisprudence is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Topic details
Total words: 7,257
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.5% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.0%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos